作者：民主党英国总部 俞滨
在全球化进程不断推进的背景下，世界变得愈加开放，且这一趋势难以逆转。真正的文明不仅仅局限于地域或文化背景，而是建立在对所有种族、信仰和国家的包容和理解上。
开放、自由的全球社会是未来人类文明发展的必然方向，因为只有实现资源、信息、文化和人才的自由流动，世界各国才能在共同繁荣的基础上实现可持续发展。
然而，当前世界范围内的政治右倾化趋势引发了我深深的忧虑。以德国、荷兰和美国为例，我们可以观察到，右翼势力在这些国家的崛起并非偶然，而是背后蕴含着复杂的社会经济因素。当前的许多政治领导人高喊类似“拯救国家”的口号，试图通过强调本国利益，激发民众对现状不满的情绪。
这种政治策略表面上似乎是在回应人民对生活改善的迫切需求，但实际上是将民粹主义和民族主义情绪最大化利用。这种民粹主义运动的核心，是通过渲染国家面临的“外部威胁”，来掩盖自身治理能力的不足，并通过排斥外来文化和移民，来寻求所谓的“国家重塑”。
进一步分析这种现象，可以发现这种右倾化的背后隐含着一种与纳粹主义相似的意识形态。纳粹主义在20世纪30年代的德国兴起，正是通过激发国民对外来者和少数族裔的仇视，煽动民族优越感来强化国内的政治控制。如今，现代右翼民粹主义借鉴了这一策略，通过煽动民族主义情绪和排外主义，试图打造一种“纯粹”的民族认同感。这种行为无异于通过制造分裂和对立，来实现短期的政治利益，而这种做法严重阻碍了全球化和多元文化的发展。
但为什么右翼政党能够迅速的吸引到大量支持者呢？原因在于右翼民粹主义者能够提供一种简单直接的叙事框架。将社会问题归咎于移民、全球化或外部威胁，提供了一种看似明确且简单的解决方案。这种叙事能够迅速获得共鸣，他们善于运用情感政治，通常通过激烈的言辞和强有力的形象，塑造出“强人”领导者的角色，以此安抚选民的不安全感。他们往往依赖于排外主义和民族主义，通过宣扬“本国优先”的政策，强调保护本土就业、限制移民，满足了这些群体对经济安全和文化认同的需求。这种通过强调“我们”与“他们”的二元对立，强化了选民的集体认同感和归属感。并且他们大多数善用社交平台，这种信息传播模式放大了右翼政客的声音，使他们能够更直接地与选民沟通，绕过传统媒体的筛选，形成一种“直接民主”的错觉。在这种机制下，右翼民粹主义者通过持续制造热点议题、煽动情绪化讨论，成功地吸引并保持了公众的关注。然而，正是这种迎合选民情绪的策略，使得右翼民粹主义可能导致社会更加分裂，削弱全球合作与多元文化的发展，从长远来看，对人类文明的进步构成了潜在威胁。
当前世界的右倾化趋势不仅是对全球化的反动，更是对人类文明进步的挑战。如果这种趋势继续发展下去，可能会导致国际关系的恶化，全球合作的倒退，以及各种族、文化间冲突的加剧。
我们必须倡导真正的文明理念，即超越国界、种族和信仰的包容与理解。只有在这一基础上，才能构建一个自由、开放且可持续的全球社会，实现全人类共同繁荣的目标。与此同时，各国政府和国际组织也需要加强对民粹主义的监测和干预，避免其对社会稳定和国际合作造成进一步的破坏。全球的未来在于合作与包容，而非孤立与对立，只有这样，才能推动世界朝向更加和谐与繁荣的方向发展。
Right-wing Shift and Globalization: The Conflict and Coexistence of Civilizational Progress
Author: Bin Yu
In the ongoing process of globalization, the world is becoming increasingly open, a trend that seems irreversible. True civilization is not confined to specific regions or cultural backgrounds; it is built on the foundation of inclusivity and understanding among all races, beliefs, and nations.
An open, free global society is the inevitable direction for the development of human civilization. Only by achieving the free flow of resources, information, culture, and talent can countries around the world realize sustainable development based on shared prosperity.
However, the current global trend of right-wing political shifts deeply concerns me. Taking Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States as examples, we can observe that the rise of right-wing forces in these countries is not a coincidence but is driven by complex socio-economic factors. Many current political leaders rally behind slogans like “save the nation,” aiming to stoke public dissatisfaction by emphasizing national interests.
At first glance, this political strategy seems to address the people’s urgent need for a better life, but in reality, it maximizes the use of populism and nationalism. At the core of these populist movements is the tactic of portraying external threats to mask their governance shortcomings. By rejecting foreign cultures and immigration, they seek to “reshape” the nation.
A deeper analysis reveals an ideology behind this right-wing shift that echoes elements of Nazism. The Nazi movement in 1930s Germany gained traction by stirring up hostility against foreigners and minority groups, promoting a sense of national superiority to strengthen political control. Modern right-wing populism borrows from this playbook, inciting nationalism and xenophobia to build a “pure” national identity. This approach aims to create divisions and opposition, securing short-term political gains but severely hindering the progress of globalization and multiculturalism.
Why, then, are right-wing parties able to attract a large number of supporters so quickly? The reason lies in the simple and direct narrative framework offered by right-wing populists. By blaming social problems on immigrants, globalization, or external threats, they provide seemingly clear and straightforward solutions. This narrative resonates quickly, as right-wing populists effectively use emotional politics. They often employ strong rhetoric and powerful imagery to construct the role of a “strong leader,” calming voters’ insecurities.
These leaders frequently rely on anti-immigrant and nationalist policies, promoting a “country-first” agenda that emphasizes protecting local jobs and restricting immigration, thus meeting voters’ demands for economic security and cultural identity. By highlighting a binary opposition between “us” and “them,” they reinforce voters’ sense of collective identity and belonging. Moreover, they adeptly use social media, amplifying their voices through this mode of communication. It allows them to bypass traditional media filters and engage with voters directly, creating an illusion of “direct democracy.” In this context, right-wing populists successfully maintain public attention by continuously generating hot topics and stirring emotional discussions. However, this strategy of pandering to voter sentiment could lead to greater social division, weakening global cooperation and cultural diversity. In the long term, this poses a potential threat to the progress of human civilization.
The current trend of right-wing shifts worldwide is not just a reaction against globalization but also a challenge to the advancement of human civilization. If this trend continues, it may lead to worsening international relations, a decline in global cooperation, and intensified conflicts among different races and cultures.
We must advocate for a true concept of civilization, one that embraces inclusivity and understanding beyond borders, races, and beliefs. Only on this basis can we build a free, open, and sustainable global society, achieving the goal of shared prosperity for all humanity. At the same time, governments and international organizations need to strengthen their monitoring and intervention against populism to prevent further disruption to social stability and international cooperation. The future of the world lies in collaboration and inclusivity, not isolation and confrontation. Only in this way can we push the world towards a more harmonious and prosperous direction.
