作者：中国民主党英国总部党员 程敏
众所周知，在我国当今圣上习近平多年来的勤耕不缀下，中国无论是从前引以为傲的经济增长速度，抑或是原本就少的可怜的言论自由，都在以一个飞快的速度滑向文革时期。官媒肉喇叭口中的繁荣盛世与市井小民口中的怨声载道形成了鲜明的对比。而这一幕又恰似中国政府极力宣扬的社会主义核心价值观，诸如民主、自由等，官媒提那是社会正能量，你小老百姓敢举个牌子宣传那就是不自量力的寻衅滋事了。但是有一点，无论宣传口和市井间的舆论风向反差有多大，有很多中国人似乎打心眼里觉得只要习总这个“穿新装的皇帝”下台，很多问题就会迎刃而解，甚至包括很多海外反共人士，他们也觉得中国人今天的困境来源于一个愚蠢且刚愎自用的皇帝。所以言语中总是透露出对过去几十年来中国言论自由的唏嘘怀念。
首先，我个人并不认为习近平下台对中国来说是好事，甚至从中国民主化的实际考量，我非常希望习近平能够一直连任甚至长命百岁下去，我们反贼圈子里有句俗话“一粉顶十黑”，意思是一个共产党的愚蠢拥趸对共产党造成的破坏要超过十个反贼，还有一句话“反贼骂一千句也不如我党一记铁拳”，意思是我们费劲九牛二虎之力可能也无法叫醒中国人，还会被认为是包藏祸心，妄图“颠覆伟大的社会主义政权”。但共产党不时落下的一记铁拳却往往可以立马使得死心塌地的爱国者们懵圈乃至恍然大悟自己不过是韭菜一根。在我看来，习表面上是中共的总瓢把子、一教之主，实际上根据他所做的事，他恰恰是全世界功劳最大的反贼！很多人经常打趣习为中国的“总加速师”，这是有事实依据且可以解释的。
习上台以来和他的老朋友川普一样，做过无数的大动作，他的修宪连任彻底打破了许多人对中国转型民主化的美梦，他对香港的打压吞并让全世界醒悟过来中共就是一个背信弃义、无法无天的黑社会老大。也让台湾人彻底明白所谓一国两制不过是“骗过来养熟了杀”的流氓手段。他对新冠疫情时期灭绝人性的管控措施的洋洋得意，他对中国所剩无几的言论自由的赶尽杀绝，他对洗脑教育“入身、入心、入魂”的全方位加固、他对战狼外交的推崇，他对全世界大撒币却唯独无视本国底层人口就医、教育的困境，无一不在蚕食着中共原本就所剩无几的公信力与国际信用。这也是时至今日，中国的国际声誉一落千丈的原因，外国游客不愿意来华旅游，底层人民为了生计疲于奔命，许多国家反感中国的人数比例高居不下。所以在“挖社会主义墙角”、削弱中共统治根基这一块，什么民主党，什么法轮功都得靠边站，习总绝对是彪炳史册，功盖千秋的第一人！
那我们换一个角度，既然习总在反共的赛道上如鱼得水，那么如果习总现在下台了会是什么情况呢？我大胆揣测，如果习总是正常下台，那么继任者可能会继承习总的衣钵，在“加速”的道路上继续一骑绝尘，带领中共奔向末路。而如果习总是被以逼宫这种不体面的方式赶下台，那大概率是上位者会是邓小平式的“虚伪实用主义者”，嘴上喊着“黑猫白猫抓住老鼠就是好猫”，暗地里修修补补经济、给欧美递个笑脸，假装松一松言论管制——比如让几个温和批评的声音上台面唱唱戏——给老百姓脖子上的绳子稍稍松半寸，换来一阵感恩戴德。结果呢？政治结构没变，民众意识没醒，西方为了经济利益又乐得装瞎，中国人恐怕又要沉浸在“明君再世”的美梦里了。与其这样换汤不换药还要冒巨大风险，还不如让习总继续折腾，毕竟稳定的蠢往往比又坏又蠢造成的危害要小得多。
上帝欲使人灭亡，必先使其疯狂，我希望习总在折腾道路上继续“撸起袖子加油干”、“油门踩到底加速”，习总每干一天，中共就被削弱一分、民众的愤怒就堆积一分、自由世界对中共的厌恶与警惕也会多加一分。让我们一起祝愿习总长命百岁、折腾万岁吧！至于习总把中共折腾完蛋了以后中国会走向什么样的未来，还是到那一天再说吧！
Xi Jinping’s Step-Down? A Long Life Would Be Better
By Cheng Min, Member of the UK Headquarters of the China Democracy Party
As we all know, under the diligent efforts of our present ruler, Xi Jinping, China’s once-prized economic growth and already scarce freedom of speech have rapidly regressed toward the era of the Cultural Revolution. The stark contrast between the state media’s grand proclamations of a “prosperous era” and the grievances voiced by ordinary citizens has never been more evident. Ironically, this reflects the so-called “core socialist values” that the Chinese government promotes—terms like democracy and freedom are deemed positive when used by state media, yet when an ordinary citizen dares to hold up a sign advocating for them, they are accused of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble.”
Many Chinese people, including even some overseas anti-CCP activists, seem to believe that if Xi Jinping, the “emperor in new clothes,” steps down, many of China’s problems will be resolved. They attribute the country’s current plight to a foolish and obstinate ruler, often reminiscing about a past when freedom of speech in China seemed less restricted.
Personally, I do not think Xi Jinping stepping down would be beneficial for China. In fact, from the perspective of China’s democratization, I sincerely hope Xi Jinping remains in power indefinitely—perhaps even living to a hundred. Within anti-CCP circles, there is a saying: “One loyal CCP supporter is worth ten critics.” It means that a die-hard CCP loyalist can cause more damage to the Party than ten dissidents combined. Another saying goes: “A thousand words from dissidents cannot compare to one punch from the CCP.” No matter how hard we try to wake the Chinese people up, we are often labeled as conspirators trying to overthrow the “great socialist system.” But when the CCP itself delivers a harsh blow—through repression or economic failure—loyal patriots are often left bewildered, sometimes even awakening to the reality that they are nothing more than expendable “leeks” for the regime to harvest.
Despite officially leading the CCP, Xi is, in practice, one of the most effective anti-communist figures in the world. Many jokingly call him China’s “Supreme Accelerator-in-Chief”—a title that is well-deserved and based on solid evidence.
The “Acceleration” of Xi Jinping
Since taking office, Xi Jinping has made countless reckless moves, much like his old friend Donald Trump. His constitutional amendment to abolish term limits shattered many people’s hopes for a democratic transition in China. His suppression of Hong Kong exposed to the world that the CCP is a faithless and lawless mafia organization. His handling of Hong Kong also made it crystal clear to the Taiwanese that the so-called “One Country, Two Systems” was nothing more than a ruse—a tactic to lure and then strangle.
Xi’s ruthless pandemic control measures, his relentless crackdown on freedom of speech, his deepening of brainwashing education, and his aggressive “wolf warrior diplomacy” have all contributed to the rapid erosion of the CCP’s already fragile credibility—both domestically and internationally. His reckless foreign aid spending, while neglecting his own citizens’ healthcare and education, has only further disillusioned the Chinese people. These factors combined have led to China’s plummeting global reputation, deterring foreign tourists and fueling widespread discontent. Today, China is viewed with growing suspicion and resentment worldwide.
In other words, when it comes to “undermining the foundations of socialism,” no democratic movement or religious opposition group can compare to Xi Jinping. He has single-handedly done more damage to the CCP than any organized resistance ever could.
What If Xi Jinping Steps Down?
If Xi were to step down under normal circumstances, his successor might continue his “acceleration” efforts, pushing the regime further toward collapse. However, if he were ousted through a coup or internal power struggle, the new leader would likely be a pragmatic “fake reformer” in the mold of Deng Xiaoping—someone who pays lip service to economic openness while making superficial concessions to the West. This new leader might loosen some speech restrictions, allowing controlled dissent to create an illusion of change. The regime could ease restrictions just enough to pacify public anger, leading to a temporary illusion of a “wise ruler’s return.”
In such a scenario, the fundamental political structure would remain unchanged. The public would remain largely unaware of their continued oppression, and the West, driven by economic interests, would eagerly turn a blind eye once again. China would sink back into its cycle of authoritarian resilience. If that is the case, why risk a chaotic leadership transition for superficial change? It would be far better to let Xi continue his self-destructive path—after all, a consistent fool is far less dangerous than a cunning manipulator.
Let Xi Jinping “Accelerate” to the End
There’s a saying: “Whom the gods would destroy, they first drive mad.” Xi Jinping’s continued leadership ensures that he will keep pushing the CCP toward its own demise. Every day that he remains in power, the CCP weakens, public dissatisfaction grows, and the free world becomes more wary of China’s authoritarianism.
So, rather than wishing for Xi’s resignation, let us wish him a long and healthy life—so that he may continue his work of self-sabotage. Long live Xi Jinping’s acceleration!
As for what comes next once Xi Jinping finally brings down the CCP? That is a question for another day.
