抗议者们手持写有“中共无耻两会，恐怖黑社会大会”，“两会不代表人民，代表马列共匪”，“DOWN XI JINPING”, “END CCP”等口号的横幅和标语，党员们高喊着口号，表达他们对中国政府执政方式的不满和对民主自由的渴望。他们指责中国两会是对人民权益的漠视和对异见声音残酷的打压，呼吁国际社会关注中国政府反人类反人权的行为。
On the occasion of the “Two Sessions” in China, the UK Headquarters of China Democracy Party held a protest activity.
On the occasion of the convening of the “Two Sessions” in China, the members of the UK Headquarters of China Democracy Party held a protest demonstration in front of the Chinese Embassy in the UK on the afternoon of March 3, 2024. They carried banners and slogans, protesting against the annual so-called “Two Sessions” of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Protesters held banners and placards with slogans such as “Shameless Two Sessions of the CCP, Terrorist Mafia Congress,” “The Two Sessions do not represent the people, they represent the Marxist Communist bandits,” “DOWN XI JINPING,” “END CCP,” and others. Party members shouted slogans, expressing their dissatisfaction with the governance of the Chinese government and their desire for democracy and freedom. They accused the Chinese Two Sessions of ignoring the rights of the people and brutally suppressing dissenting voices, calling on the international community to pay attention to the inhumane and anti-human rights actions of the Chinese government.
Participating members of the China Democracy Party stated, “The so-called Two Sessions only represent the vested interests of the evil Xi family dynasty of the CCP, and have no relation to the people. The Two Sessions are shameless lies.” They protested because they yearn for democracy and freedom, asserting that the Chinese government should not continue to suppress the voices of the people. Some participants also expressed: “Reject dictatorship, democratic China, a promising future.” This protest in front of the Chinese Embassy in London demonstrated the determined pursuit of freedom and democracy by Chinese democracy activists.
Participating members in the protest: Wang Guanru, Huang Hua, Jiang Yushan, Lin Lijun, Jin Xuecen, Chen Mingwang, Yu Gang, Liao Liuyan, Zhao Qiang, Guo Yuxuan, Zhu Shuanglin, Yu Weiliang, Hu Xiao, Wei Chenyu, Wen Shengli, Liu Yaoxing, Li Jingtang, Zhou Yong, Lin Mingqiang, Gu Xiaofeng, Chen Bin, Junius, and others.
Reported by the UK Headquarters of China Democracy Party
Support for Dr. K, Support for Freedom and Democracy
On the afternoon of January 26, 2024, some members of the UK Headquarters of the China Democracy Party gathered at Kings Cross St Pancras train station in London, holding signs to express support for the British pianist Dr. K, support for freedom and democracy, and disdain for dictatorship and tyranny.
At around three o’clock in the afternoon, British pianist Dr. K once again appeared there to perform and engaged in interviews with the audience and several media outlets. Holding a Winnie the Pooh toy, he delivered a passionate speech, emphasizing the recent conflict with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) “little pinks” here. He framed it as a struggle between democratic rule of law and authoritarianism, a clash between civilization and barbarism, and a counterattack against CCP “little pinks” intentionally undermining and violating the legal rules of the Western civilized world. He urged everyone to download and share the live video of the incident, letting more people around the world see the truth, as the CCP fears the truth and the awakening of the people the most.
Members of the democracy party on-site expressed: The reason we stand up to express support for Dr. K is that we share the same values; we both love freedom and democracy and oppose dictatorship and tyranny.
Members participating in this event: Li Jingtang, Jin Xuecen, Lin Lijun, Liao Liuyan, Chen Mingwang, and others.
Reported by the UK Headquarters of China Democracy Party
21日上午的会议中黄慈萍、廖天琪、潘永忠、王冠儒、黄华、索南次仁、 David Hardingham、刘汉祥、霍嘉志、蔡明达、王国兴、Chakra Ip 、Steven Tsang 都做了精彩的现场发言，阐述了各自对中国政局的看法以及未来的规划；下午通过网络连线的方式，魏京生、王军涛、谢志伟、袁弓夷做了网络发言，强调了未来中国民主化的必然性和重要性，国是会议举办的原因和规划也都有相关说明。欧洲各地的中国民运负责人为未来的行动提出了各自的设想，此次会议凝聚了各方的共识，取得了圆满的成功。嘉宾发言结束后，中国民主运动海外联席会议秘书长黄慈萍女士解答了嘉宾和民主党成员的现场提问，参加会议的民主党成员踊跃发言，在交流互动的环节中表达了对未来中国时局走向的关注与忧虑，我们都希望海外的中国民运组织能够开拓新的境界和高度，而国是会议的举办将能带动实现这一目标并促进最终完成中国的民主化。
中国民主党英国总部报道
The UK Headquarters of the China Democracy Party Hosts Preparatory Meeting for the “National Affairs Conference” in Europe
On January 21, 2024, the China Democracy Movement Overseas Coalition, Voice of Europe, and the UK Headquarters of the China Democracy Party organized a preparatory meeting for the “National Affairs Conference” at the Royal National Hotel Conference Center in London. The event aimed to gather opinions from various parties and discuss future strategies.
In early November 2023, Wei Jingsheng, Wang Dan, and Wang Juntao proposed in San Francisco to hold a “National Affairs Conference” both domestically and overseas. The goal and mission were to discuss plans to end the corrupt and authoritarian rule of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and establish a democratic China. This initiative is positioned as a responsible political force for the future of China and the world, an indispensable part of the international democratic camp.
During the morning session of the meeting on the 21st, speakers including Huang Ciping, Liao Tianqi, Pan Yongzhong, Wang Guanru, Huang Hua, Sonam Chodon, David Hardingham, Liu Hanxiang, Huo Jiazhi, Cai Mingda, Wang Guoxing, Chakra Ip, and Steven Tsang delivered insightful speeches, expressing their views on the Chinese political situation and future plans. In the afternoon, through online connections, Wei Jingsheng, Wang Juntao, Xie Zhiwei, and Yuan Gongyi made online speeches, emphasizing the inevitability and importance of China’s future democratization. The reasons and plans for holding the “National Affairs Conference” were also explained. Leaders of the Chinese democracy movement in Europe put forward their respective visions for future actions. The meeting achieved consensus from all parties and was deemed a complete success.
After the guest speeches, Huang Ciping, Secretary-General of the China Democracy Movement Overseas Coalition, answered questions from guests and members of the democracy party on-site. Democratic Party members who attended the meeting actively expressed their concerns and worries about the future direction of China during the interactive session. They hope that overseas Chinese democracy organizations can explore new horizons and heights, and the organization of the “National Affairs Conference” will contribute to achieving this goal and ultimately promote the democratization of China.
By the UK Headquarters of the China Democracy Party
One of the pathetic circumstances in this world is when two individuals of similar age live under the same sky and on the same land: one basks in the adoration of countless people as a star, experiencing abundant glory and favor, while the other endure the vicissitudes of life and the sorrow, and suffering that the former will never notice or imagine.
The Esu Wiki case that occurred in China in 2019 rewrote the lives of 24 teenagers, including nine minors. Chinese authorities publicly tried this case for the crime of infringing on citizen’s personal information. But ironic is that the Chinese government has never shown such concern for citizen’s privacy as in this case in the past. Reports indicate that the real reason for this sudden change in the Chinese government’s consistent stance on citizen’s privacy rights is that the victims of this private information leak are relatives of Xi Jinping.
The individual identified by the authorities as the mastermind, Niu Tengyu, is still detained in Sihui Prison in Guangdong for starting his 14-year-long sentence. Recently, his mother found that Niu Tengyu’s health was abnormal a lot and similar to those caused by poisoning or abuse when she went to visit him in prison. In contemporary China, orchestrating accidental deaths through non-public executions is a method employed against weak public influence political prisoners. However, according to reports from Kyodo News and The Epoch Times, Niu Tengyu played a limited role in the Esu Wiki case, far from being to that extent considered the mastermind. There is even some controversy regarding whether Niu Tengyu can be classified as a political prisoner in traditional meaning because the true leaker of Xi Jinping’s family’s private information is a member of an anti-Chinese government website called Zhina Wiki that is outside the jurisdiction of the Great Fire Wall. Due to some connections that once existed between the Zhina Wiki and Esu Wiki websites, Niu Tengyu, a Website operation member of Esu Wiki who can apprehended within China’s borders, became a convenient scapegoat for Chinese authorities.
According to the creator of the Zhina wiki, Niu Tengyu had once “watched” the anti-extradition law amendment bill protests in Hong Kong together with him, and this might have been a partial reason for the Chinese authorities to perceive him as a dissident and which led him to get further persecution. But in this case, whether Niu Tengyu is a political prisoner or not, the persecution from authorities in the 21st century due to offense or suspicion of offending those in power is truly sickening. What’s important is that we see in countries like China how insignificant an ordinary person is to Communist leaders and their families. The slightest suspicion of offense toward those in power and their families is enough to destroy everything in the life of an ordinary civilian and their families, no matter how trivial.
Niu Tengyu grew up in a single-parent family, living with his mother, grandmother, and grandfather. Since the 2019 Esu Wiki case, his grandparents passed away successively due to the unbearable shock. His mother, the only one he relies on, spends her days in tears, enduring the torment of heart disease. She eagerly anticipates an early reunion with her son. On his birthday, she wrote a letter to him in prison, filled with longing and love, although this letter might never reach him due to obstruction by the Chinese authorities:
“Just last night, I dreamt of you again, and you had grown much taller. Tears filled my eyes when I saw you, yet you smiled and said, ‘Mom, you look beautiful when you smile. I always love seeing you smile. Mom, please don’t cry for me!’ As my vision began to blur, I opened my arms to embrace you, but suddenly, I woke up…”
Under the totalitarian grip of Marxist ideology, numerous young individuals like Niu Tengyu and their families suffer the same pain for various reasons. The creator of the anti-Chinese government website Zhina Wiki, Xiao Yanrui, is also from a single-parent family. However, when his mother attempted to travel abroad in 2022 to visit her son studying in Canada, she encountered obstruction from Chinese authorities. The Chinese police, in a mocking tone, asked her, “Would you miss your son?” Xiao Yanrui’s mother retorted, “Would you miss your mom?”
There is also a group of young people in this world who share the same ethnicity as Niu Tengyu but are the primary win-over targets of the Chinese communist united front policy. They are those free-world citizen of Chinese communist family background. Some of them excel in calculation and navigate adeptly between the conflicting identities of free-world citizens and supporters of the Chinese authoritarian regime. They use the guise of political correctness to promote their so-called diversity and inclusivity defined by themselves, which has become their defense of the tyranny’s diversity from tyrants around the world, allowing them to find a fashionable excuse to flatter tyrants like Xi Jinping. They are not entirely ignorant of what is happening in China, nor are they coerced by someone into their doing. Instead, they willingly, as privileged individuals of Chinese descent, come to China, an authoritarian state, to advance their careers, looking down upon the masses with a superior attitude and relishing the flowers and applause arranged for them by the authorities.
They have confirmed a cruel truth that even in the 21st century, freedom, this fundamental human right, is still perceived by many as a privilege and regarded by some as a source of their own sense of superiority. In China, the masses attempting to bypass the Great Firewall using VPNs to access the international internet is considered illegal. However, Eileen Gu, who holds significance for Chinese authority’s united front purposes, enjoys numerous freedoms in China, including unrestricted use of international social media platforms like Instagram and Twitter. Ironically, when someone brought up the Chinese government’s restrictions on people’s internet access to Eileen Gu, she defended the Chinese government by stating that anyone in China can download VPNs from the Google Play Store to connect to the international internet, which reminded me of an ancient Chinese story called Why Not Eat Meat Porridge (A Chinese story with similar ironic to the Let them eat cake).
Eileen Gu’s response to criticism from American netizens once again exhibited a form of elitist arrogance prevalent in the younger generation of the free world. When addressing questions from reporters regarding this criticism, she condescendingly mocked her critics as uneducated individuals who will never become Olympic champions. Eileen Gu is a typical self-serving ethnic minority leftist youth who grew up in a white elite culture education and elite family, playing the racial card based on post-colonial bullshit to gain an unfair competitive advantage. They have never experienced life under the tyranny of their native culture’s political traditions alongside those sharing their ethnicity. Even her grandparents were among the beneficiaries of the totalitarian government that is currently persecuting Niu Tengyu. However, such a group of people ardently play the rhetoric of affirmative action to position themselves as victims, attempting to deconstruct the cornerstone of Western values. Their critique of Western civilization is so sharp because they know that in a society of free speech, their cynical bullshit will only be praised or acquiesced by everyone, unlike what happened to Niu Tengyu, who offended Xi Jinping in China.
What has happened to this world? How can those who oppress others claim themselves as victims? International flights take off and land daily at Beijing International Airport, carrying numerous unsympathetic privileged individuals from so-called minority groups in the free world like Eileen Gu. These youth possess a keen sense of fashion trends and share hippie yet self-righteous short videos on TikTok. Their birthdays always file revelry, music, and whiskey, while their adolescence is always with sunshine, flowers, and pampering from others. But what about the young people who truly live under the tyranny of their native culture’s political traditions? Don’t they deserve to enjoy freedom like Eileen Gu? Don’t they have the right to grow up under the sunshine and flowers, receiving all the goodwill from the world as young Westerners do?
Another year passes, within the same world, Eileen Gu and Niu Tengyu continue to script their disparate youth. Another year passes, the joys and sorrows of humanity still do not resonate with each other.
Programme of Election Campaign for Chairman of the Fifth National Congress Of National United Headquarters of China Democracy Party
Huang Hua
January 1, 2024
I officially announced my participation as Chairman of the Fifth National Congress of the China Democratic Party National Joint Headquarters.
First, I would like to express my highest respect to Dr. Wang Bingzhang, the pioneer of China’s overseas democracy movement, and to those who are members of China Democracy Party still in prison in China! I would like to express my highest respect to the late Dr. Liu Xiaobo, winner of the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize!
1. My leadership purpose
If I win the election, my leadership of the China Democracy Party National Joint Headquarters will adhere to the public declaration of the founding of the China Democracy Party issued on June 25, 1998.
Public Declaration of the Establishment of the China Democratic Party
June 25, 1998
In view of the fact that no one has the right to use violence to maintain his rule over other people, and this phenomenon still exists in our society; in view of the fact that modern civilization and rationality have spread throughout the world, but the haze of feudal autocracy and stupidity is still hanging over In view of the various weaknesses of human nature, curbing political dictatorship and political corruption is a permanent struggle for justice; in view of the need for the general public to have their own political organizations and political spokesmen; in view of the fact that citizens’ association itself is inherent in citizens The sacred and inviolable rights of the people; we, a group of people with lofty ideals from all walks of life who are willing to devote their time, hereby propose to establish the China Democratic Party in order to promote freedom, democracy, justice, and peace.
The China Democracy Party firmly believes that all political power can only come from and serve the public; the government can only be formed according to the will of the public, operate according to the will of the public, and serve the interests of the public; the government is a server for the public, not the public the ruler of.
The China Democracy Party firmly believes that the government must be based on the conscious consent of the public and on free, fair, and direct democratic elections. It condemns any form of electoral manipulation and cheating, resolutely opposes press and publication monopoly, and opposes any vested interests. The group uses violence and economic threats to implement policies of obscuring the people.
The China Democracy Party strongly condemns the ruling group’s violent suppression of political opposition, the torture and forced labour practices of imprisoned dissidents, and strongly demands that the authorities release all those imprisoned for dissidents. The China Democracy Party believes that any ruling power obtained through violence and violent intimidation is not legitimate. The China Democracy Party will strive to eradicate all social parasitism that uses political power to obtain economic benefits and personal enjoyment.
The China Democracy Party firmly believes that all human rights contained in the [Universal Declaration of Human Rights] are the sacred and inviolable rights inherent in human beings. The China Democracy Party will always fight against human rights violations.
The China Democracy Party opposes any form of political monopoly and economic monopoly, advocates fair political competition and economic competition, and promotes clean and efficient political operations and economic development. The China Democracy Party advocates orderly social change and opposes chaos, vandalism, looting, and violence against violence.
The China Democracy Party achieves its political goals in a non-violent, peaceful and rational manner, advocates the resolution of any disputes and differences through civilized dialogue, and opposes terrorist activities.
The purpose of the China Democracy Party is to realize direct democratic elections and establish a constitutional democratic political system. Establish a political decentralization mechanism. Let political rights restrict each other and ensure a virtuous cycle, so that no individual or group can base power on violence, implement the nationalization of the military, completely eradicate the soil that produces political dictatorship and political corruption, and make the Chinese nation Completely get rid of the tyranny of power.
The China Democracy Party implements a direct democratic election system within the party. The party committees and leaders at all levels are elected from the bottom up and implement a term system. The party’s National Committee is a service organization for all party members.
The China Democracy Party recruits into the party all those who agree and support the party’s program and purposes and are willing to make contributions and unites and unites all those who agree with the party’s political goals and policies.
2. My personal study and work resume in UK
Born in Hangzhou in 1955. Currently a British citizen.
In 1992, I studied in the UK at his own expense. While studying in the UK, I worked in a restaurant for 7 years as a work-study overseas student until I graduated with a master’s degree in international business from London Metropolitan University in 2000.
In 2000, I worked for a financial company in the UK. While running a small restaurant, went bankrupt.
In 2004, I started working as a freelance interpreter and consultant in an immigration and human rights law firm.
I am married and have a history of divorce.
My self-media YouTube: Lao Huang talks about asylum.
3. Resume of my participation in the democratic movement
In 1993, I joined the Chinese Democratic United Front and the UK branch of the Chinese Liberal Democratic Party. Later, China Democratic Justice Party, China Democracy Party. I once served as Secretary-General and Deputy Secretary-General under the leadership of Mr. Gao Peiqi, Wang Xizhe, Wang Min and Xu Wenli. After 2008, I faded out of frontline work in the pro-democracy movement.
On November 24, 2021, I and Mr. Wang Guanru established the UK headquarters of China Democracy Party. Currently serves as the UK Affairs Advisor of the China Democracy Party National Joint Headquarters.
4. My work plan during my term of office
1. Reform the China Democracy Party Joint Headquarters and establish a chairman and two vice-chairmen. The Supervisory Committee was renamed as the Disciplinary Supervision Committee, which conducts disciplinary inspection and supervision on the top leaders and ordinary party members of the Federation General Assembly in accordance with disciplines and procedures, and strictly enforces party discipline.
2. Establish a secretariat, organization and investigation department, publicity and foreign affairs department, intelligence and technology department, youth action department, and Hong Kong, Tibet, Xinjiang and Mongolia Working Committee.
3. Establish a file system for core party members.
4. Re-establish China Democracy party branches in various countries around the world, and provide qualified party branches with financial assistance, technical support, human support, legal assistance, etc. Specific assistance details will be formulated by the headquarters.
5. A special team will be set up to continue to assist the families of party members who have suffered in the country.
6. Establish a democratic cadre school in the UK to provide centralized training on the universal values of freedom, democracy, and human rights to qualified party members or Chinese students from all over the world, and to train key personnel for one month each time. Graduation certificates will be issued to those who pass the exam. And require graduates to complete organizational tasks.
7. Rescue mechanism. The headquarters’ New Yellow Bird Operation Plan will continue to be carried out to rescue real domestic suffering party members and their families.
8. Actively establish contact with the governments of major democratic countries in the world.
9. Actively contact Hong Kong’s democratic forces, the government of the Republic of China (currently in Taiwan), and various ethnic minority organizations.
10. Create opportunities to lead the headquarters’ special team to return to China through legal channels and strive to carry out legal and independent party activities in mainland China within the framework of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China.
11. Urge the Chinese Communist government to release and stop the persecution of political prisoners.
12. Party-run enterprises. Solve the funding problem.
13. I promise that I will only work for one term and never for a second term. Young people are the future of our organization.
14. If I lose the election, I will try my best to assist the new chairman in completing the organizational rectification work.
Supporting Niu Tengyu: Protest Held by the UK Headquarters of China Democracy Party
On December 24, 2023, which is also the Western traditional holiday of “Christmas Eve,” the UK Headquarters of China Democracy Party organized a protest in front of the Chinese Embassy in London in response to the global movement supporting Niu Tengyu.
The Niu Tengyu injustice case is also known as the Vulgar Wiki case. Niu Tengyu, born on March 12, 1999, from Shanxi, worked for the “Vulgar Wiki” website. At that time, the website exposed personal information about Xi Mingze, the daughter of the top leader of the Chinese Communist Party. Subsequently, 24 operators and members of the website were arrested by the CCP and heavily sentenced. Niu Tengyu was designated as the main offender and sentenced to 14 years, with the term ending on September 10, 2033. The Niu Tengyu injustice case is a typical example of China’s unfair judicial system and human rights violations. It reflects the plight of ordinary people without power or influence in China, often becoming scapegoats and victims of numerous wrongful cases.
During the protest, party members Hu Xiao and Junius delivered speeches, demanding that the Chinese government cease the persecution of Niu Tengyu, calling for the immediate release of Niu Tengyu, and expressing solidarity with all political prisoners and prisoners of conscience in China. Members of the China Democracy Party participating in the protest stated, “We gather here not only to express support for the persecuted, but also to appeal to the international community to pay more attention and care to the human rights violations by the Chinese government. This protest is not only a condemnation of the Chinese government but also a firm defense of universal values. We hope that through such actions, more people will be awakened and inspired to promote democracy and freedom in Chinese society.”
Party members participating in the event included Wang Guanru, Huang Hua, Jiang Yushan, Chan Bin, Lin Lijun, Jin Xuecen, Liao Liuyan, Chen Mingwang, Yu Gang, Zhao Qiang, Guo Yuxuan, Hu Xiao, Gu Xiaofeng, Lin Mingqiang, Liu Yaoxing, Zhu Yifan, Junius, and others.
Reported by UK Headquarters of China Democracy Party
UK Headquarters of China Democracy Party held a protest on World Human Rights Day
On December 10, 2023, marking the 75th World Human Rights Day, the UK Headquarters of China Democracy Party, along with various human rights organizations, gathered in front of the Chinese Embassy in London to hold a protest, demanding that the Chinese government cease human rights violations.
The protest commenced around 3 p.m. on that day, bringing together members from diverse backgrounds, including Uighurs, Tibetans, Hong Kongers, Southern Mongolians, and others. They held banners and placards, vociferously voicing their concerns on a range of human rights issues. From freedom of speech to religious freedom, and the rights of minority groups, they expressed their deep concerns and support, accusing the Chinese government of widespread human rights infringements. The London police maintained order on the scene, ensuring that the event proceeded in a peaceful and secure atmosphere. Passersby and the media gathered, showing significant interest and support for the protest, and Voice of America provided extensive coverage of the event.
Members of the UK Headquarters of China Democracy Party raised banners with slogans like “Better to die than live without freedom,” expressing a strong desire and pursuit of freedom and human rights. Party representatives Zhu Shuanglin and Junius delivered speeches in Chinese and English, respectively, condemning various actions by the Chinese government that violate human rights. This protest not only commemorated World Human Rights Day but also served as a collective outcry against human rights issues in China, with the hope of garnering broad international attention and action to contribute to improving the human rights situation in China.
Party members participating in the event included Wang Guanru, Jiang Yushan, Chan Bin, Lin Lijun, Jin Xuecen, Chen Mingwang, Yu Gang, Zhao Qiang, Guo Yuxuan, Zhu Shuanglin, Eleanor, Junius, and others.
Reported by Chan Bin, UK Headquarters of China Democracy Party
As a person of color from a socialist country, the first time I heard a white person say this to me in the real world, I felt an unprecedented sense of sadness, anger, and despair. As a person of color in a white-dominated society, I may never have the courage to openly challenge those elegant socialist youths: Why is it that a generation of all-day faineant Western millennials like you who enjoy the utmost individual freedom and Humane law achievable in human history but fantasize about the socialist ideology as a great ideology even though it always brings violence, totalitarianism, and poverty in historical practice?
When someone tells me that China is not a real socialist country, I always tell them this: ‘It is socialism.’ China is a socialist country, the Soviet Union was a socialist country, and the Third Reich was also a socialist country. Despite sympathizers of the first two always trying to distance themselves from sympathizers of the Third Reich, even though their socialist theories may have different names, they all operate on the same logic and expect to build a society on a foundation of hatred and lies.
The admission ticket of becoming a socialist is possessing a soul marked by arrogance and an unrestrained desire for power, and it is also why even supporters of socialism often harbor mutual animosity towards each other. The animosity between National Socialists and Scientific Socialists is fundamentally nothing different from the conflict between Stalinists and Trotskyists, and it’s a purge initiated by power-hungry individuals in authority against their smart-ass comrades who are not in power, as well as a natural unremitting hatred from smart-ass arrogant toward their competitors that is difficult to heal.
Fortunately, Western socialists have not yet attained the absolute power that their comrades currently hold in China. Even so, their pampered successors already have eagerly and impatiently established various ideologically similar Marxist clubs within Western universities even in the same one, then established multiple positions for self-proclaimed Politburo and committee. If these middle-class rich kids merely confine their commie great leader make-believe games to this extent, then everything doesn’t seem all that bad. But socialists are power-driven animals; they will utilize all the resources at their disposal to satisfy their desire for power and the urge to struggle. When they are unable to impose tyranny on everyone, they resort to spreading their lies and hatred throughout society as much as they can.
The scientific socialists and their national socialist comrades are seasoned players in Goebbels-style lies, while they all understand the importance of propaganda for subsequent political actions.
First, they advocate for an ideology of extreme exclusivity that guides people on what to think and how to act through a paranoid, radical political ideology.
Secondly, they will frame a narrative structure of altruism to describe a future promise with an extreme egoist core that deceives the people into believing a story of a future utopian society with substantial benefits without hard work.
Then, they simplify viewpoints into abstract yet impractical political slogans, constructing a binary opposition framework for resorting to demonizing and symbolizing individuals with opposing political views through the Reductio ad Hitlerum (such as labeling all opponents of Marxism as fascists).
Finally, scientific socialists will use all available propaganda resources to alter the public’s general view on lifestyles and moral concepts and promote their core demand with verbal fallacies: “The Third Reich, the Soviet Union, and China were not real socialism. What we advocate now is real socialism. Everyone should allow us to experiment once more, even at the cost of countless lives, and then we will establish a real socialist state in the free world.” However, when you criticize the Soviet Union or China in front of them, they will tell you that these socialist countries never have a chance for more time to further development, which often makes it very challenging to discern where their real viewpoints and positions really lie. These verbal fallacies without any logic are always repeatedly elaborated upon by lengthy academic bullshit from academic authorities who are engrossed in postmodernist philosophy, also spread widely by all-day faineant, privileged petite bourgeois Marxist students through contaminated academic sources and cognitive channels. Ironically, such a group Machiavellian as scientific socialists, who habitually lie and lack logic but often have the word “truth” on their lips, on shameless they are indeed no less evident than their national socialist comrades.
Another shared characteristic between state socialists and scientific socialists is their hatred toward capitalism and the inherent natural rights of every individual. Although today’s Western socialists often describe a state that fully nationalizes private property and even citizens themselves as state capitalism, the fundamental definition of capitalism is the sanctity and inviolability of individual private property in the face of government and bureaucratic entities. Centuries ago, William Pitt, leader of the Whig Party in the UK, emphasized this in one of his speeches:
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter — all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement!
Since the fundamental definition of capitalism revolves around the sanctity of individual private property, how can a state that recklessly infringes on citizen’s private property be called a capitalist state? It’s akin to those Marxist politicians who dub themselves “democratic” socialists and swear to build a socialist society while upholding the existing constitutional democratic system made me cringe.
Throughout history, there hasn’t been an example of a coexistence between a socialist society and a liberal democratic system. However, numerous socialist politicians ascend to power through free elections yet continually erode constitutional principles. From the National Socialist Adolf Hitler to the scientific socialist Hugo Chávez, each of them exploited the majority’s resentment and bias against the minority to gain power, subsequently spreading xenophobic narratives to pave the way for distorting constitutional principles. Those tedious constitutional principles may seem dull and fogyish, but it is once people destroy these old-fashioned articles — They’ll realize that they are facing the same trouble as the ancient Romans that they find Octavian is the only name left on the candidate list for the next election day. As Padmé Amidala said in that Star Wars movie: “So this is how liberty dies… with thunderous applause.”
As property and freedoms, these natural rights, are erased from society one after another by socialists, people will eventually find that even the right to life will no longer belong to themselves but to the state or some symbolized concept. Scientific socialists are much like their national socialist comrades in that they can’t tolerate the existence of any diverse groups within society. The socialist Gulags and purges have not only been for freedom fighters who stood up to them but also for all differentiator or those who do not conform to their ideological standard within society. Their ideology wants a world with no individualism and free will anymore, where those who are different from the masses will get erased, and diverse groups will become one group until everyone becomes uniform and willingly sacrifices everything unconditionally for the great ideal of socialism.
However, what makes scientific socialists more successful than their national socialist comrades should be thanks to their excellent skills in public opinion manipulation. When Marxists carry out genocide and persecution against certain specific groups, they never openly issue a statement similar to their national socialist comrades, such as the Final Solution to the Jewish Question. Just like the Marxists today always use ambiguous terms like anti-Zionism or Islamophobia to openly portray their great ideals of genocide, the soviet Marxists also favored labeling the people they persecuted as “individuals without nationality and tribe” or “bourgeois internationalists,” using vague terms to cloak genuine systemic racial extermination and persecution in an inconspicuous facade. If Hitler were to ask Stalin, “Hey buddy, do you also hate Jews?” our astute comrade Stalin would sit up straight and respond, “No, we are eliminating some of the exploiting class who don’t believe in atheism, for support the oppressed classes of the Middle East against the oppression of the Zionist colonialists!”
Today’s scientific socialists still emulate their predecessors and prefer to carefully disguise themselves as allies of the oppressed to conceal the ideological core of their genocide and elimination of diversity. The Marxist regime in China builds concentration camps for genocide in East Turkestan but claims they are just running some re-education schools. They actively enforce assimilation policies in Hong Kong and Cantonia but declare they are combating so-called pro-colonialists. They advocate traditional culture demanding women to return to the home while manipulating pro-CCP pseudo-feminists to sow mutual hatred and societal division among people in the free world. They commit countless crimes against Chinese dissenters and the most vulnerable groups in society, yet they say that Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party, which promotes social justice, legalization of same-sex marriage, and protects indigenous rights, is a neo-fascist party.
The supporters of the Chinese Communist Party in the West don’t perform much worse than their comrades. Since they cannot physically eliminate their opponents in democratic societies, they resort to another strategy. They use the freedom granted by the democratic system and all available propaganda channels to attempt to eradicate the public opinion environment that nurtures dissenters. That is commonly known as political correctness. They’ve used cancel culture to cancel the original definition of freedom of speech and have redefined its meaning again; They‘ve reinterpreted founders of the modern West from centuries ago through a contemporary lens as racists but remain indifferent to hate speech from contemporary individuals like Jeremy Corbyn; They’ve labeled American patriots who oppose Marxism and are faithful to classical liberalism as fascists. However, these Marxists who are full of critical spirit have a miraculous fondness for terrorist organizations like Hamas, despite these terrorists having blood on their hands from countless children, women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and innocent civilians. Why do Western Marxists never seem to see the suffering of humanity? Is it because the souls of these people are the same as Karl Marx and Marxism comes into the world dripping from head to foot, from every pore, with blood and dirt?
Therefore, compared to choosing to believe in Marxist scholars who confine themselves in ivory towers and repeatedly propagate through academic bullshit they made within universities and academic institutions, I choose to trust the experiential judgment way from ordinary people.
如果它看起来像鸭子、游泳像鸭子、叫声像鸭子，那么它可能就是只鸭子。
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.
What is socialism? National socialism is socialism, scientific socialism is socialism, and the Nazis, the Soviet Union, the China, they all socialism. And I, here, for calling an international capitalist revolution to overthrow socialism.
Protest Event Commemorating the One-Year Anniversary of the Blank Paper Movement
On the afternoon of November 26, 2023, members and supporters of the UK headquarters of China Democracy Party gathered in front of the Chinese Embassy in London to hold a protest rally, commemorating the one-year anniversary of the Blank Paper Movement.
Urumqi Tragedy! Uphold the dynamic “clear to zero” without wavering! Inhumane lockdown of people at home! This scene repeats itself as if it were yesterday! A year ago, from universities to the streets, from Nanjing to Shanghai, Beijing, Chengdu, and other places, after the June Fourth Incident, it was the largest-scale resistance against tyranny in China. People were pushed to the brink by Xi Jinping’s “clear to zero” policy. People took to the streets shouting angrily, “Down with the Communist Party,” “Down with Xi Jinping,” forcing the Xi Jinping regime to abandon its absurd pandemic lockdown policy. The Blank Paper Movement awakened political consciousness among many Chinese.
Members of the China Democracy Party in front of the London Embassy raised blank sheets of paper, recreating the scenes of last year’s demonstrations. They chanted slogans such as “Xi Jinping step down” and “Down with the Communist Party,” expressing strong anger and dissatisfaction with the CCP regime. Party members participating in the event in the cold wind expressed that from the shock caused by last year’s Xinjiang fire, which triggered the Blank Paper Movement, they saw the power that frightens the Xi Jinping regime. As long as there is a consciousness of resistance, there is hope for China.
The protest was initiated and organized by party member Zhu Shuanglin. Party members participating in the event: Lin Lijun, Liao Liuyan, Zhu Shuanglin, Yu Gang, Gu Xiaofeng, Zhang Sheng, Lan Ziming, Hu Xiao, Zhao Qiang, Guo Yuxuan, Liu Yaoxing, and others.
Reported by Chen Bin, UK Headquarters of China Democracy Party
